The official Pink Floyd CD store, as well as the official Pink Floyd web sites, both use "Pulse" or "PULSE" interchangeably when naming the recording, and only include the bullets when using the name in an artistic manner. I'd like to know for what reason the bullets are used in the name for this entry. And it doesn't stand for anything, although that hasn't stopped backronymers (like "Pretty Uninspired Light Show Extravaganza" from the Waters fans.) 154.20.188.29 10:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC) Reply Actually, they're not even bullets, more like centered dots, like highbrow multiplication symbols. dharmabum 20:36, 13 July 2006 (UTC) Reply ĭoes "P*U*L*S*E" stand for anything, or are the asterisks simply there for effect? Demonofthefall 02:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC) Reply There aren't any asterisks, they're bullets. Extra concert footage is probably from different concerts, as (as I understand it) it comes from seized bootlegger material. dharmabum 00:24, 13 July 2006 (UTC) Reply Do you know how much material there's on the DVD? Is that also only one concert? There's probably some extra material on the disc too - but got an idea of how much? - |EPO| 18:23, 13 July 2006 (UTC) Reply Head over to the P*U*L*S*E (film) article, which documents all the special features.
The source music for the album is culled from several different concerts, while the video is just one concert - a pretty significant difference (although I'm sure we'd have it that way even if it wasn't). But would it be fair to collect them - or what ? - |EPO| 14:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC) Reply I'd suggest doing it it as we do here one article ( P*U*L*S*E) for the CD/tape/vinyl music release, and one article ( P*U*L*S*E (film)) for the DVD/VHS/Laserdisc video release. The big question is how much difference there is on the contents of the medias? Of course one big article is better than three small ones. Unfortunately it seems like we're not many Pink Floyd fans, so I'm coming here to seek help :). Right now we got three articles and are wondering if there really are material enough to have three different arcticles. On Danish Wikipedia we're currently dicussing if the CD, VHS and DVD should be under same article. It is still operating off of the replacement batteries. Has this been a problem in this case? Drutt ( talk) 12:10, 17 November 2007 (UTC) Reply The original batteries started leaking a bit, but I didn't check it until a few months after it stopped blinking (which had been about 3 years, if I remember correctly). lonadar 21:50, 28 January 2008 (EST) Old batteries sometimes begin leaking acid. (The text regarding the LED that was included with the package is appropriate and would probably serve this function, as long as it's not violating any copyright by being included in it's entirety.) I would also keep the link to the alternate circuit as a link at the bottom of the entry. I would suggest removing information regarding the mechanics of the mechanism and reducing any technical information to a warning that replacing the battery is not suggested. Though how-to is not within the scope of Wikipedia, the LED is a specific enhancement to a specific release of the recording and warrants a mention. I would say that most of the section is in appropriate for wikipedia -Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.170.16.157 ( talk) 23:00, 22 December 2007 (UTC) Reply I agree, to a point. I've replaced my battery 3 times since I got the album. If I pull out the inner sleeve from the cover, the LED circuit just slides out of the end of the cardboard tube. I also have no trouble replacing the battery. This bit with the scalpel seems a bit extreme. (It wasn't glued.) There is a notch at the top end for the (protruding) LED and circuit board to slide out of it's cardboard envelope thus making battery replacement extremely easy.
63.25.252.95 21:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC) Reply In my cd, you pull on the cardboard holder and the entire thing comes out. If this material is available off-site, a link should be added and the section removed. KyuzoGator 20:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC) Reply I agree it's pretty inappropriate.
Maybe it should be narrowed down to technical details only? - kingboyk 16:08, 18 March 2006 (UTC) Reply Mine still blinks with the original ol little gimmick. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a howto guide. I'm not sure this belongs here - at least in it's current "howto" form.
0 kommentar(er)
